Lord justice munby biography of william hill
Category:Lord Justices of Appeal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pages in category "Lord Justices of Appeal"
The following pages are in this category, out of approximately total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)B
- Richard Baggallay
- Jonathan Baker (judge)
- Scott Baker (judge)
- John Balcombe
- John Eldon Bankes
- David Bean (judge)
- Jack Beatson
- Roy Beldam
- Tom Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill
- Norman Birkett, 1st Baron Birkett
- Colin Birss
- Charles Bowen, Baron Bowen
- George Bramwell, 1st Baron Bramwell
- Henry Brandon, Baron Brandon of Oakbrook
- Nigel Bridge, Baron Bridge of Harwich
- John Brightman, Baron Brightman
- Henry Brooke (judge)
- Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
- Nick Browne-Wilkinson, Baron Browne-Wilkinson
- Patrick Browne (judge)
- Denys Buckley
- Alfred Townsend Bucknill
- Ian Burnett, Baron Burnett of Maldon
- Stanley Burnton
- Richard Buxton (judge)
Traditions & Culture of Collecting Articles by and about Collectors, Librarians, and Booksellers
The History of Bibliography of Science in England A. N. L. Munby
Foreword
This lecture by A. N. L. Munby, Fellow and Librarian of King’s College, Cambridge, was delivered in Los Angeles on March 29 and in Berkeley on April 4, In Los Angeles it was presented as the Eighth Annual Zeitlin & Ver Brugge Lecture in Bibliography, a series sponsored by the UCLA Graduate School of Library Service and supported by Mr. and Mrs. Jacob Zeitlin. In Berkeley the lecture was presented in a parallel series, the John Howell Lectures in Bibliography, established at the UCB School of Librarianship by Mr. and Mrs. Warren R. Howell in honor of Mr. Howell’s father.
We are indebted to Mr. Munby for the lively scholarship that characterizes this publication, to Lawton and Alfred Kennedy for the design and printing, and to our donors not only for their generous financial contributions but also for their continuing interest in the bibliographical education of librarians.
RAYNARD C. SWANK, Dean School of Librarianship, Berkeley
ANDREW H. HORN, Dean Graduate School of Library Service, Los Angeles
The History and Bibliography of Science in England, the first phase,
Interest in the history of science has grown so enormously during the last two generations that some of its modern practitioners may be forgiven for their apparent belief that, if they did not actually invent the subject themselves, at least their immediate predecessors did so. I am neither an historian nor a scientist; and I am well aware that in addressing you on this subject I am giving a number of hostages to fortune. My interests lie in tracing the development of trends in book collecting, in bibliographical techniques and in scholarly method. And, whereas we already have reasonably full accounts of collectors of incunabula, early English literature, illuminated manuscripts, autographs and music, n Before: Mr Justice Munby (now Lord Justice Munby) Mr Adam Clemens (instructed by Rex Forrester of the Medical Defence Union) for the First and Second Applicants Mr David Lock (instructed by Mills & Reeve LLP) for the Third and Fourth Applicants Ms Barbara Connolly (instructed by Legal Services, Cambridgeshire County Council) for the Fifth Applicant Mr and Mrs Ward in person Ms Kate Wilson (instructed by the BBC Litigation Department) lodged a skeleton argument on behalf of the British Broadcasting Corporation Hearing dates: 16–17 June Further submissions dated 22–23 July The case as it is now presented raises two questions of fundamental importance in relation to the practice and procedure of the Family Division, indeed of all family courts: i) The first relates to the meaning and effect of section 12(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice Act and involves a question the answer to which, despite the by now extensive jurisprudence on the topic, is seemingly not altogether clear. ii) The second relates to the anonymity of professional witnesses in care proceedings under Part IV of the Children Act specifically, whether three categories of witness – medical experts, treating clinicians (in which phrase I include nursing as well as medical staff) and social workers – should have their anonymity protected by contra mundum injunctions. I emphasise at the outset that, although these questions have to be resolved in the context of the concrete facts of the specific case – after all, as Lord Steyn made clear in In Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [] UKHL 47, [] 1 AC , at para [17], “an intense focus on the comparative importance of the specific rights being claimed in the individual case is necessary” – the truth is that the particular factual context here is largely unexceptional. Without for a moment seeking to diminish the tremendous significance A recent Court of Appeal judgement was described as the death of the deprivation of liberty safeguards. However, best interests assessor Lorraine Currie disagrees, and says Lord Justice Munby&#;s ruling provides useful tools for practitioners. Over the last two years a wealth of case law has issued forth from the Court of Protection concerning the deprivation of liberty safeguards (Dols). In some cases, judgements have added to the definition of a deprivation of liberty (Dol), while in others, they have muddied the waters. [Update your Dols knowledge at Community Care&#;s forthcoming conference on safeguarding adults at risk.] The recent Cheshire West and Chester Council case from the Court of Appeal does both, and some are seeing it as the death of Dols, maybe even the final proof that the safeguards don’t work. This case concerns a year-old man with cerebral palsy, Down’s syndRe Ward
Lord justice munby biography of william hill